What's driving me increasingly crazy about them is that it demonstrates a complete failure to grasp the nature of the original statement. "Bisexuals are invisible" is about a systematic society-wide denial of the mere existence of anyone of that sexuality, such that "not gay" = straight and vice versa. The fact that someone didn't mention private schooled people in their particular stupid of the day isn't remotely fucking comparable, and you're weakening the original point. Fantastic job, there.


(I just got internets back after an extended absence and am running a wee bit behind.)