| S2 Layout Issues |
[Nov. 20th, 2008|04:46 pm] |
Hi, Guys. I know a good many of the S2 themes are kinda hosed right now. Something changed with the LJ migration to their new data center. The Bloggish and Style Contest themes have their CSS hosted at LJ. That's by LJ's design, with how the code is distributed. The code is set to use LJ's CSS proxy to handle the access and display of the CSS settings. Since LJ's move, though, the CSS proxy has been kaput. But the CSS itself at LJ is still working. Until we can find a way around all this, a couple users have a way that you can use the Custom CSS in your customization area to get your layouts pretty damn close to the original for that layout and theme.
You'll enter two sets of code in that area. The first one would be the code from this URL:
http://stat.livejournal.com/sixhtml/themes/common/base-weblog.css
Just go there, copy it, and paste into the custom CSS box.
And the second set you enter will be from the direct CSS URL for your specific theme. You can locate this URL by viewing the source of your journal in your browser (View Source code). If you scroll down to the <link rel="stylesheet" section of the source code, you'll see the direct url to your theme's CSS at livejournal. Go there, copy that code, and paste it after the base-weblog.css code above. Make sure you have "No" selected to use the included base code (it's a dropdown), and that the URL field above the custom CSS box is empty. Click to save changes, and your theme will display much as it is supposed to. There is occasionally an element like a border that doesn't come through, but it's pretty close.
As an example of the CSS URLs, this is the one for the Baby theme for the Bloggish layout:
http://stat.livejournal.com/sixhtml/themes/lilia/theme-baby.css
The CSS URLS will be start with
http://stat.livejournal.com/sixhtml with the rest varying by theme and layout.
I'll still be looking for an alternative to having to futz with custom CSS, but in the meantime, that method of applying the CSS will get your Bloggish and Style Contest journal themes put back together pretty well.
Thanks,
Robin |
|
|
| Fandom Next of Kin |
[Nov. 20th, 2008|12:31 pm] |
So, OTW has a new policy, which when I first read about it, it sounded pretty damn cool.
B. Fannish next-of-kin
Registered archive users may designate a fannish next-of-kin. A next-of-kin agreement allows the transfer of content maintenance in the case of a user's permanent incapacitation or death.
Both parties to the agreement must be registered users of the Archive.
The Archive's role in this agreement is only to act as a facilitator. If the person designated as the fannish next-of-kin activates the agreement by sending a message to the Archive, the Archive will not do any independent investigation to confirm the necessity for the transfer.
A fannish next-of-kin agreement is confidential and accessible only by designated members of the archive team, who may only use it for purposes of implementing the agreement.
And then you get down to the FAQ...
12. What if my fannish next-of-kin decides s/he's tired of being my fannish next-of-kin?
13. What if I decide I don't like my fannish next-of-kin agreement?
14. What if my fannish next-of-kin does something I wouldn't like?
These are all perfectly valid questions...but could you IMAGINE IT?
( Cut for hypothetical capslock of rage. )
ETA: Link |
|
|
| RPattz is dead :( |
[Nov. 20th, 2008|12:06 pm] |
|
Okay, not really! Morbid move by Summit to hype up the hype some more? |
|
|
| Looking for a post in one of the possible "Lounge" coms. |
[Nov. 20th, 2008|11:42 am] |
A friend of mine recently got her car towed for a bullshit offense (her parking sticker wasn't in the correct place, but it was ON THE CAR.) This reminded me of a post that I think may have been in either fandom wank or one of the "lounge" communities, where a guy who had a similar thing happen wrote an "open letter" to his city officials that basically consisted of a bunch of macros. I think this also may have wound up being linked in the Somethingawlful forums. Anyway, I wanted to link my friend to it to cheer her up, but I can't find it now. I was wondering if anyone had it in their memories.
Thanks! |
|
|
| 'Twilight' in handy, condensed MS Paint format |
[Nov. 20th, 2008|11:15 am] |
|
Actually, now that I've given it a bit of thought, I have to say it might be a little unfair of me to compare this to the book since it's well-written, intentionally funny and displays a clear lack of taking itself seriously. Then again, tripping over the cat and bruising my ribcage on the edge of a bookcase was also better than what I've read of Twilight, so make of that what you will. |
|
|
| |
[Nov. 20th, 2008|08:16 am] |
Thomas Kinkade's 16 Guidelines for Making Stuff Suck
There are a lot of amusing things about this piece, which describes the guidelines that "Painter of Light" (TM) Thomas Kinkade laid out for the makers of his direct-to-video film The Christmas Cottage. ("Create an overall sense of soft edges, strive for a 'Barry Lyndon' look." Or, "Hidden details whenever possible, References to my children (from youngest to oldest as follows): Evie, Winsor, Chandler and Merritt. References to my anniversary date, the number 52, the number 82, and the number 5282 (for fun, notice how many times this appears in my major published works).") You can also boggle over the fact that somehow they got Peter goddamn O'Toole to work on this thing.
Of relevance to Fandom On the Internets, however, is the fact that this thing stars Jared Padalecki. One wonders what, if anything, the SPN fans make of it. |
|
|
| Really, Anne? |
[Nov. 19th, 2008|09:04 pm] |
"We have to love the person in the New York Times who says mean things about our book. We have to love him. We have to have an attitude of love and not one of competitiveness, or vengeance, or anger, or spite." -- Anne Rice, speaking of her return to Catholicism (From her interview on Interfaith Voices).
Apparently, you're free game as long as you're not in the NYT! Oh, it's good to know that even though the hot new kids like Twilight have sought to dazzle us, the oldies-but-goodies are still kicking. |
|
|
| |
[Nov. 19th, 2008|06:01 pm] |
| [ | mood |
| | Spiffy | ] |
| [ | music |
| | Still Alive - GLaDOS | ] |
I had to share this. I regret nothing.
You remember that article about Twilight in the New York Times? There was an entry about it posted here on Monday?
Well, I have a paper for my writing class due tomorrow and we pretty much have to find an article in the New York times and write our reaction to it or an analysis or something.
You probably guessed which article I'm using. <3
My thesis? Twilight fans are crazy.
I hope my writing teacher doesn't fail me, ahaha. |
|
|
| The First Trickle... Twilight reviews (non-pro) |
[Nov. 19th, 2008|12:00 am] |
Hope this is okay, but someone on my LJ f-list won tickets to a Twilight advance screening, and here are some choice bits of her review of the movie that really rather amused me. (Don't want to flood her LJ)
Well, I did like the movie. It was a good movie. The book was way better, without a doubt better.
Well, I'm afraid already.
ETA 1: Thanks to ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/userinfo.gif) shallow_kid for pointing out the lion_lamb review thread.
ETA 1.5: Thanks to sistercoyote for reminding me that Rotten Tomatoes should be getting their reviews in soon.
ETA: 2: Reviews just keep pouring in. Will continue adding as time allows.
Chicago-Tribune says fwoopy!
Ebert thinks it's a metaphor.
Variety lays the smackdown.
The V247 thinks KStew's face was stuck on "sulk".
Defamer thinks it'd appeal to fans of cheesy Sci-fi. (Oh Sci-Fi network, why didn't you sign the deal first?)
Village Voice swoons, then falls asleep
MetroMix Chicago says "meh".
Even Twihards aren't loving it?! Inconceivable!
Entertainment Weekly tries to gush. Fails.
The San Francisco Chronicle thinks watching the movie will help you understand the hype. (except not)
Nolan's Pop Culture Review confuses the Cullens with beer.
The Naperville Sun wants to laugh at inopportune moments.
Fangst calls a duck a duck.
Gawker introduces us to the mental image of Twihards' groin tingles. (DO NOT WANT)
Slant wishes Edward and Bella would drop dead.
The Examiner wants to sic PETA on the Cullens.
A TwiMom takes issue with RPattz. World implodes.
Montreal Movies is disgusted
sortofbeautiful (homebase of Team Jacob) also has a review thread.
Jam snarks about Edward's Volvo.
The New York Times: Doing its damnest to legitimize OMG.
The AV Club thinks Twilight suffers from an identity crisis.
Montreal Gazette disagrees with Montreal Movies.
The Arizona Republic proves that Phoenix has taste. (And that's why SMeyer moved away)
FlickFilosopher sez: AMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAZING MOVIE.
ETA n+1: Thanks to everyone for making my inbox explode for linking to reviews, especially mariem_1, who is a review finding machine. RT's at 43%.
ETA n+2: I'll update links one last time on Friday, then collapse in a post-Twilight heap. Someone send my inbox some first aid? (Dear Gmail, I love you)
So, any bets on when the wank level reaches 9000 and f_w will have to step in? (My moneys on Friday morning) |
|
|
| |
[Nov. 18th, 2008|11:43 pm] |
hey anyone know what's up with the skyehawke fic archives? i was in the middle of reading when POOF the site's down and the lj community doesn't have any news about it.
i mean, maybe it's just a matter of not updating an expired credit card for billing purposes, and it'll get fixed in about eight to twelve hours, but dang it's irritating as hell when you're in the middle of a novel (and one that's actually pretty well written, too! i think. maybe my memory is giving me rose-colored glasses) and can't continue because the only place you can find it is on the one site that's currently down. |
|
|
| DBZ lawl. |
[Nov. 18th, 2008|02:08 pm] |
Hay itz Goku!
Who else is having major childhood flashbacks? I can't wait for this campy goodness to come out. |
|
|
| LJ is back. |
[Nov. 18th, 2008|08:03 pm] |
An hour early, even.
http://status.livejournal.com/ says:
"LiveJournal was down today for a period of time due to migration to a new server facility. We're back now. As the site comes back up pages may load slowly; this is expected and should resolve within the next few hours." |
|
|
| A suggestion for passing the time while LJ is down |
[Nov. 18th, 2008|12:35 pm] |
PICSPAMS, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, AND LOTS OF THEM.
1. Pick someone hot
2. Make a picspam on your own JF
3. Comment here wif link (and NSFW warnings if necessary)
4. ????
5. PROFIT
To get the ball rolling, I present: Rahmspam.
[ETA oh my god, you guys, you guys I think LJ is back.] |
|
|
| *twitch* |
[Nov. 18th, 2008|10:39 am] |
OH GOD. Now Twitter is down, too.
C'mon, Internet, don't make me resort to Facebook for time-wasting purposes!
Also, any Gaia users around here? zOMG is lonely because I have no Gaia pals.
edit: Twitter and LJ are back, but the Gaia party's just starting. ;D I (jurijuri) just friended the whole thread! Hooray! |
|
|
| LJ is down for maintenance |
[Nov. 18th, 2008|11:30 am] |
My first post here, hope this is okay. This will likely spur me to use JF more.
Livejournal went down at 11am EST as they are moving their servers to a data center in Montana. Current LJ status page
I made a silly LJ downtime poll
Feel free to spread the link around. I wonder how much workplace productivity will go up today? |
|
|
| Well, hell. |
[Nov. 18th, 2008|10:26 am] |
| [ | mood |
| | In need of withdrawal therapy. | ] |
LiveJournal is down as it moves cross-country and Insane Journal isn't loading. Probably due to its servers becoming robust thanks to the extra traffic from LJ.
Don't fail me, JF! If I don't refresh something constantly I start to sweat. |
|
|
