Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



insignificant other ([info]snacky) wrote,
@ 2007-08-28 14:30:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
My thoughts on lol_meme: Let me show you them!
Oh, hey, is our assigned topic this week [info]lol_meme? I can work with it. Here's my essay:



So, right, [info]lol_meme hasn't always been kind to me, or to my friends. Unfortunately, it seems like every time I've ever looked at it, it's always been something horrible about me or my friends, and that made me feel bad. I have been told by various memers that it's not always like that, it's fun and supportive and has changed their lives for the better, and while it's certainly not my experience, I don't see why it can't be theirs.

But, you know, so what if I feel bad (and yes, I can say that *now*, when I'm not feeling particularly LOL SENSITIVE! :D). [info]fandom_wank has certainly made a lot of people feel bad, and I'm not a huge hypocrite - we tell people all the time don't read FW if you don't like it, and following those lines, I don't have to read [info]lol_meme if I don't like it. And so, I don't (usually. I need to learn not to click on links if I'm feeling masochistic. THIS IS A BAD IDEA)! Thus, my feelings are not hurt, and [info]lol_meme goes happily about its memeing ways, and we don't get involved with each other. I know, I know, I make it all sound so simple! But here's the thing, I don't want to think about people saying shit about me anonymously, because then I think about all the people that I know are on the meme, and then I think, well, they must be the person saying shit about me, and... that way lies madness. Better to not read. And, okay, I am not really so self-absorbed as to think [info]lol_meme is talking about me all the time. It's just that that's what I've seen when I've looked at it. ;)

As for the whole "[info]lol_meme is taking up too much bandwidth and is being rude to the admins" kerfuffle? So not my business or my problem. The meme mods and Robin and ZR will work this out on their own. I *did* comment in ZR's journal on the post where everyone seemed to joining in, and here's why: as a long-time FW member and mod, I can understand why the meme and their mods might feel threatened, and be worried about the meme's future. So yeah, even if I don't particularly like the meme, I totally get why it sucks to feel like a community you care about, no matter how silly and stupid it is, might be in trouble.

Finally, I have said it before and will say it again: I don't like anonymous posting. It's not my thing. But everyone has their own fun online, and it's not up to me to tell anyone where they can post and how they can post. I don't have to participate, if I don't want to, so I don't. So, the meme can be merrily memeing without me. No great loss for them, I am sure. :D


Okay, I hope that's sufficient for "My thoughts on [info]lol_meme week."


(Post a new comment)


[info]eljuno
2007-08-28 07:05 pm UTC (link)
In meme-ese, ILU BEST.

In general, yes, pretty much.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]snacky
2007-08-28 07:21 pm UTC (link)
ILU2 BB! Did I get it right? ;)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]phosfate
2007-08-28 07:14 pm UTC (link)
Do I have to have thoughts on it? I'm supposed to be xeroxing.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]rotten_fish
2007-08-28 07:17 pm UTC (link)
ARE YOU ME

WHEN DID THIS HAPPEN??

no wait, i'm supposed to be faxing. Nevermind.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]phosfate
2007-08-28 07:19 pm UTC (link)
The cool kids all scan the documents and send them as .pdf files.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]wankprophet
2007-08-28 07:24 pm UTC (link)
Mimeograph, dammit. We're old skool.*





*But not as old skool as the monks over there in the scriptorum.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]littlebitca
2007-08-28 09:38 pm UTC (link)
*Sniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiffff*

Mmmmmmm.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]rotten_fish
2007-08-28 07:24 pm UTC (link)
But the gas lady told me to! :( It's peer pressure on both sides!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]snacky
2007-08-28 07:28 pm UTC (link)
Drop the faxing and write your essay now!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]snacky
2007-08-28 07:22 pm UTC (link)
You don't *have* to, but the teacher will be mad if you blow off another essay.

Lucky you, I'm supposed to be doing excel spreadsheets. :(

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]wankprophet
2007-08-28 07:27 pm UTC (link)
Checking up on something that I have no interest in and virtually no opinion about, I'm still somewhat befuddled by the "good" anons whining that they're being tarred with the same brush as the "troll" anons.

Seriously, if you're going to enjoy the benefits of being anon (nobody knows for certain who you are), you're just going to have to suck it up and deal with the drawbacks (you can't prove for certain who you're not.)

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]snacky
2007-08-28 07:36 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, I'm not sure I get that part. If you're anon, you're all the same to people who read it, right?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]wankprophet
2007-08-28 07:39 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, that's the part that isn't really being emphasized, which makes the divide difficult to bridge.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]aralinde
2007-08-28 09:41 pm UTC (link)
I can't help it--I always pictured that meme as the same five or six people pretending to be ten people each.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]bubosquared
2007-08-29 12:45 pm UTC (link)
This is why I could never get into anonymemes at all. It's a big amourphous blob of internet-matter conversing with itself. In all-caps!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]phosfate
2007-08-28 07:36 pm UTC (link)
Perhaps they should institute some sort of system by which each user is assigned a unique sequence of characters to identify himself or herself.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]wankprophet
2007-08-28 07:42 pm UTC (link)
Wait. Are we talking alphanumeric here? As in the stuff NASA used to identify the first man on the moon, and the way we distinguish between the presidential candidates? That's heavy-duty, but brilliant.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]phosfate
2007-08-28 07:49 pm UTC (link)
I think a small set of standardized characters -- say, 20 or 30 -- could be combined to form individualized designations for hundreds, if not thousands, of users.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]also_not_a_pipe
2007-08-29 03:28 am UTC (link)
Oh, they're just peeved because Fox News hasn't blown up a van for them yet.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]vigilanterodent
2007-08-28 07:43 pm UTC (link)
You know, until this week I honestly hadn't realized the [info]lol_meme was still around? I mean, I just kind of assumed for some reason that the charm of it would wear off.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]snacky
2007-08-28 09:15 pm UTC (link)
I think it's like the energizer bunny of memes!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]smo
2007-08-28 09:22 pm UTC (link)
Either that, or it's one of the Deathly Hallows.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Anonymous)
2007-08-28 08:30 pm UTC (link)
http://www.greatestjournal.com/users/lol_meme/6487.html?thread=28528471#t28528471

Meme loves you too. Since that one time you logged in, I've never heard a bad word about you there that wasn't trolling. That's pretty exceptional.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]snacky
2007-08-28 09:14 pm UTC (link)
Oh my goodness, meme! I am taken aback at your love. And finally, a meme link I don't regret clicking! :D

Thank you! I'd post my love on the meme, but that will get me in trouble ;)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]smo
2007-08-28 09:21 pm UTC (link)
But here's the thing, I don't want to think about people saying shit about me anonymously, because then I think about all the people that I know are on the meme, and then I think, well, they must be the person saying shit about me, and... that way lies madness.

In meme-ese, IAWTMFC!

(Reply to this)


[info]sashenka
2007-08-28 09:47 pm UTC (link)
My feelings on the lol_meme are mostly apathetic with a side of occasional curiosity or amusement. But also, I think that anonymously, people like badmouthing anyone who gets attention they want. People who are badmouthing you (or any other mods or well-known/liked wankas) are probably sad because they aren't ZOMG WANKA!POPULAR. I hate to pull that you're just jealous card, but in this case, it's likely true. Yes, there are some disliked wankas, but most people just ignore people they don't like for genuine reasons. Besides, you're a likable and laid-back person. I would be really hard-pressed to find a legitimate reason to dislike you. Now that I have legitimized the jealous!card, I'm ready for my sorting into Sparkly-Poo!

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]ecchaniz0r
2007-08-29 02:49 am UTC (link)
What she said. *points up*

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]gelasius
2007-08-28 10:49 pm UTC (link)
I am... confused as to what the point of lol_meme is. Even AFTER spending ten minutes scrolling through its posts.

I'm not sure I actually want to know, though. ::shrug::

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]puipui
2007-08-29 12:23 am UTC (link)
There's a point? I thought for sure they'd sanded all those babies down to keep people from putting an eye out.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]gelasius
2007-08-29 01:45 am UTC (link)
Oh! maybe THAT's what I'm missing. Thanks. :)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]kijikun
2007-08-29 02:24 am UTC (link)
But what are your thoughts on Alan Rickman?

(Reply to this)


[info]flightstothesea
2007-08-29 12:33 pm UTC (link)
This is why you are great. And what the nonny above said; most of the time I see your name mentioned on the meme in a hatey way, it's usually T_S trolling (he tends to be really painfully obvious about it).

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2007-08-31 09:05 pm UTC (link)
SNACKY, YOU ARE CLASSY TECHNOLOGY 100%! :D

(Reply to this)

Didn't see your email address anewhere, but
[info]lady7jane
2007-09-02 09:32 am UTC (link)
I wanted to apologize for being such a gossipy hag on Sepiamagpie's journal. I realise it's none of my business. (Though I didn't mean anything bad by it.)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Didn't see your email address anewhere, but
[info]sepiamagpie
2007-09-06 05:38 am UTC (link)
Well, I ain't Snacky but thanks. I wasn't really comfy with that starting with Hnky nowhere to even tell me if it bugged her or not. Knowing you meant no harm is great too :)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Didn't see your email address anewhere, but
[info]lady7jane
2007-09-06 06:08 pm UTC (link)
:-)

Also, Happy Birth+1 Day!

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: Didn't see your email address anewhere, but
[info]snacky
2007-09-06 06:19 pm UTC (link)
Hey, thanks for apologizing. I really don't feel like it's my place to start gossiping about other people in the aftermath of that crazy post, because it's only going to end badly, no matter what.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map