Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Lurker Above ([info]spacelogic) wrote,
@ 2008-03-10 15:58:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:*Snarl*

hay u guyz
u guyz u guyz u guyz I have this idea for the FUNNIEST WANK EVER! Homophobic misogynist vs. racist animal abuser! Guaranteed LULZ for all!

I think I've figured it out -- c/p'd from my IJ:

Real-life Serious Bad Things that people are likely to have strong feelings about are not likely to be funny. People comparing, say, negative fic reviews to one of those Really Bad Things is usually fine -- as long as we're not told that we should agree with them.

What do you think? Does it need more explication, or might people actually get it if I put it like that?



(Read comments)

Post a comment in response:

From:
Username:
Password:
Don't have an account? Create one now.
Subject:
No HTML allowed in subject
  
Message:
 
 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map